3/31/2024 0 Comments Razer core x synapse 3 downloadIf you'd like to boost your USB-C enabled Mac's gaming prowess, this is the gear you need. It's a great companion for your MacBook and, if you're a former PC builder like myself, scratches that itch of getting to track down choice components and racking them up. I was truly sad to box the Core X and send it back to Razer. It doesn't have the USB ports and Ethernet of the V2, but honestly, I've already got enough USB hubs on my desk, I don't need another. On the plus side, the Core X sports a truly gargantuan 650W power supply (as opposed to the 500W of the V2) that can fully charge your MacBook with its 100W USB-C output. I mean, c'mon guys - is it really that hard to port? It's unfortunate because there's definitely an overlap (albeit a slim one) of Mac and Razer fans. Why no Chroma when virtually everything else from Razer is bespoke with multi-colored lighting? I imagine it has something to do with the fact that the Synapse 3 software doesn't currently support Macs and future compatibility doesn't seem to be on the road map. It's still an attractive enclosure, but if you're looking for something to sync with your Synapse 3 software, you'll have to get the V2. Part of that is because, unlike its predecessor, the Core V2, there are no Chroma LEDs. It honestly looks this good in person too. Honestly, if it wasn't for the obvious performance boost I was seeing in games, I wouldn't have known the Core X was there at all. I could tell the e-GPU was getting a workout, but the vented case and superior fans kept everything cool. Textures that I'd disabled because they deep-sixed my performance brought new life back to games that I'd "gotten bored with."Īnd through all of this, there was nothing more than a steady hum from the GPU's fans as the card did its duty (the case fan on the Core X was so quiet, it was impossible to pick out). Particle effects that I'd missed out on before were perfectly rendered. Graphics settings that would clunk my frame rates in games into the 30s were flying along at double that. Once I got going, the fans all whirred to life and I was good to go. I'll save you the benchmark graphs (mostly because I was having so much fun playing, I forgot to capture meaningful numbers), but the practical results were abundantly clear. They're no Far Cry, but they do all have ultra graphics settings, plenty of particle effects, and (especially in the case of Diablo) more than enough characters to render on screen. Diablo III, Half-Life 2, Portal, Pillars of Eternity. I couldn't use my go-to benchmark game, Overwatch, since there's no Mac version (a slight from Blizzard that I'm still sore about), but I did have plenty of other games to try out. I popped open the Activity Monitor app and displayed the GPU History window and saw that what I was doing (mostly poking around on the internet and checking emails), wasn't intensive enough to even ping Core X. There was a brief whir of the case fan when I flipped on the power, but that was it. What first surprised me about the Core X was how it didn't seem to do much of anything at first. I set things up so that all apps ran through the Core X because I wanted that sweet, sweet, accelerated life. Download the script, run it in Terminal, and then set the options accordingly (he has a handy explainer on his GitHub page). It's handy, it works, and you might take a slight performance hit, but the performance boost you'll see overall more than makes up for it. You can do it for all programs, or just select programs. What I found was a handy open source script by mayankk2308 called set-eGPU that lets you do just that, set macOS to use an external GPU instead of the onboard GPU and then set it back again. Once I got over that disappointment, I went searching for an alternative that would let me loop the input/output from my MacBook, to the Core X, then to the internal monitor. There really should be, but this is one of the rare instances where Apple has gotten ahead of market tech. What I really want is a way to stream the output directly to my LG 4k monitor, but sadly there is no such beast that will accept the output from the card in the Core X to the USB C Thunderbolt on the monitor. Then it's just a matter of plugging it in and figuring out how to hook up your Mac to utilize the Core X.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |